No no, I think it’s important to be absolutely clear about his. You said:

“there were many people who had to bring in the movie and Rose into it, missing the entire point. This is a real life person, and even if you didn’t like their character in a movie that is irrelevant.”

Then in the very next paragraph you say:

“They put the original trilogy on a pedestal, and view anything that tries to add to the series beyond that is heresy”

So which is it? Is it acceptable to discuss the quality (or lack thereof) of the films in the context of discussing abuse directed at actors – or not?

From your article I’m getting that yes it’s okay – so long as you don’t criticise the film, the writing or the characters in any way. Saying nice things is fine.